Ladakh’s Silent March & Blackout: LAB–KDA Demand Statehood, Constitutional Safeguards | October 2025 Protest
By: Javid Amin | 14 October 2025
A Protest Cloaked in Silence, Rooted in Anger
The mountains of Ladakh are preparing for a protest unlike any seen in recent years — not a rallying cry, but a coordinated silence. The Leh Apex Body (LAB) and the Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) have announced a two-hour silent march followed by a three-hour blackout across the Union Territory.
It is not just a demonstration; it is a statement. A region known for its measured temperament is signaling that its patience is wearing thin.
“The silence in Ladakh could turn into a storm,” — LAB and KDA joint statement.
The protest is scheduled for mid-October 2025 (final date under wraps for strategic reasons), with a silent march from 10 AM to 12 Noon and a blackout between 6 PM and 9 PM in Leh and Kargil. This protest, according to its organizers, is intended to amplify the people’s voice through collective silence.
Why Ladakh Is Rising: The Core Demands
The protesters are not rallying against abstract issues. Their demands are clear, constitutional, and deeply political:
-
🏔 Full Statehood: Reversing the Union Territory status granted after the abrogation of Article 370.
-
🛡 Sixth Schedule Protections: Constitutional safeguards to preserve Ladakh’s demography, land, culture, and local decision-making.
-
🏡 Land & Job Protections: Exclusive rights for locals, similar to other tribal and hill regions in India.
-
✊ Accountability for Violence: Justice for the September 24 violence where four civilians were killed and nearly 100 injured.
-
🔓 Release of Activist Sonam Wangchuk: Seen as a symbol of Ladakh’s resistance and environmental activism.
Why these demands matter
For many Ladakhis, this movement is not just about legal status but about survival of identity and self-determination. As one youth leader in Leh put it:
“We supported UT status thinking it would empower us. Instead, we’ve lost control over our land, jobs, and voice.”
The Spark: September 24 Violence
On September 24, 2025, security forces opened fire during protests in Leh, resulting in four civilian deaths and nearly 100 injuries. This event fundamentally shifted the political tone of the region. What began as negotiations over constitutional status transformed into a people’s movement demanding justice and autonomy.
“Our protest has been peaceful for years. But when the state responds with bullets, something breaks,” said a KDA youth organizer.
The violent crackdown galvanized previously divided political and religious factions in Ladakh, uniting them under a single banner.
Who Is Leading the Movement?
The protest is being spearheaded by two umbrella organizations:
-
Leh Apex Body (LAB) — representing political, religious, and community groups in Leh.
-
Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) — a coalition of political and religious leaders from Kargil.
Key voices:
-
Tsering Dorjey — Senior LAB leader, warning the Centre against ignoring Ladakh’s anger.
-
Sonam Wangchuk — Climate activist and public face of Ladakh’s rights movement (currently under detention).
-
Various Buddhist, Muslim, and tribal leaders who have come together across ideological lines — a rare show of unity in the region’s history.
The movement’s non-partisan, cross-community nature gives it unusual legitimacy and weight.
Silent March: A Tactical Innovation
Unlike conventional protests with slogans and speeches, the silent march is designed to convey power through restraint. Organizers have emphasized:
-
No slogans
-
No flags except the Ladakh symbol
-
Marchers will wear black armbands
-
Monasteries, mosques, and civil society groups will join silently
The aim is to avoid provocation while making the absence of noise itself a political statement. As a senior monk told reporters:
“Silence echoes more loudly in the mountains.”
Blackout: A Territory in the Dark
The blackout from 6 PM to 9 PM is the second, more symbolic phase of the protest. Residents across Leh and Kargil are expected to:
-
Turn off all lights and electrical appliances
-
Suspend non-essential communication
-
Light candles or butter lamps outside homes and monasteries
This is meant to represent what Ladakhis call “Delhi’s darkness over Ladakh” — a metaphor for being politically unheard since the UT status change.
“We are showing Delhi how it feels when your voice is switched off,” said a student volunteer in Leh.
Statehood Demand: The Heart of the Protest
When Ladakh was carved out as a separate Union Territory in 2019, many celebrated, believing it would lead to direct governance and development. But over time, disenchantment grew.
Core concerns:
-
Ladakh has no legislative assembly. All decisions flow from the Centre.
-
There is no local control over land acquisition, resource use, or employment.
-
Hill councils have limited power compared to state governments.
This has created what locals describe as “a democratic vacuum”.
“We are being ruled, not represented,” said a former Hill Council member.
Constitutional Safeguards: Why Sixth Schedule Matters
The demand for inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India is a cornerstone of the movement. This Schedule provides autonomous powers to tribal areas in states like Meghalaya and Mizoram, enabling control over land, culture, and local governance.
Ladakh, with over 97% tribal population, fits the demographic criteria. Activists argue that granting these protections would legally secure Ladakh’s unique cultural and environmental identity.
Land and Jobs: Fear of Being Outnumbered
One of the most visceral concerns driving the protest is the fear of demographic change.
-
Ladakhis fear outsiders may acquire land, altering centuries-old patterns of community ownership.
-
Youth fear losing out on jobs to non-residents.
-
Local businesses fear being sidelined in tourism and infrastructure projects.
This anxiety mirrors concerns once raised in other hill and tribal regions, where unregulated land transfer has led to cultural and economic marginalization.
Sonam Wangchuk: The Movement’s Moral Voice
Engineer–activist Sonam Wangchuk, globally recognized for his environmental work, has emerged as a moral compass of the movement. His arrest under preventive detention laws has intensified public anger.
“If someone like Sonam Wangchuk is silenced, it means the state is afraid of the truth,” said a Buddhist nun in Leh.
His supporters compare him to other peaceful resistance figures, saying his detention reveals the Centre’s unwillingness to engage in meaningful dialogue.
The Shadow of Violence
The September 24 violence continues to shape every aspect of the movement:
-
Families of victims have refused compensation, demanding justice and accountability.
-
Human rights groups have criticized the use of force against unarmed protesters.
-
Trust between the administration and civil society has sharply eroded.
“You can’t kill dialogue by killing people,” said a Kargil elder.
Delhi’s Dilemma: Negotiation vs Delay
The Central Government faces a strategic choice:
-
Engage seriously with Ladakh’s leadership, offering concrete steps toward statehood and Sixth Schedule protections.
-
Or continue to delay, betting on fatigue, division, or political containment.
But the silent march and blackout suggest Ladakh’s civil society is neither tired nor divided.
LAB & KDA’s Conditions for Talks
In their joint press conference, LAB and KDA leaders laid out three non-negotiable conditions before any dialogue resumes:
-
Immediate release of Sonam Wangchuk.
-
Public commitment to a roadmap on statehood.
-
Formal inclusion of Sixth Schedule in talks.
Until these conditions are met, the leadership says no further negotiations will take place.
A Rare Buddhist–Muslim Solidarity
One of the most striking features of this movement is the unity between Leh (Buddhist majority) and Kargil (Muslim majority) — a unity often tested historically.
The joint front of LAB and KDA is unprecedented in its intensity and coordination. Analysts believe this cross-community alliance gives the movement stronger political leverage and moral weight.
“When Leh and Kargil speak together, Delhi has to listen,” remarked a senior journalist in Leh.
Environmental Stakes: Ladakh Is Not Just Another Region
Ladakh is an ecologically fragile Himalayan zone. Its people have historically acted as custodians of glaciers, rivers, and ancient irrigation systems.
Leaders argue that constitutional protection is also an environmental necessity.
“Without local control, we risk ecological disaster,” said an environmental activist from Hemis.
Silence as Strategy: A Calculated Move
Political strategists view the silent march as a clever escalation without provocation.
-
It minimizes the chance of a violent crackdown.
-
It maximizes visibility in national and international media.
-
It conveys discipline and seriousness.
Unlike noisy rallies, a silent march projects unity and moral authority.
National Implications: Beyond Ladakh
The Ladakh protest is not happening in isolation. It has potential ripple effects:
-
Tribal groups in other regions are watching closely.
-
Environmental and rights activists have extended solidarity.
-
Opposition parties at the national level are likely to amplify the message.
The situation may become a test case for India’s handling of autonomy movements in sensitive border regions.
Government Response So Far
As of now, the Centre has not announced any major breakthrough in talks. Official statements have reiterated “commitment to dialogue” without concrete steps. Meanwhile:
-
Additional security forces remain deployed in Leh and Kargil.
-
Preventive detentions continue.
-
Intelligence agencies are monitoring for signs of escalation.
Political observers warn that continued silence from Delhi could radicalize an otherwise peaceful movement.
International Watch: Eyes on Ladakh
Given Ladakh’s strategic location bordering China and Pakistan, the protest has also drawn international attention.
Global media outlets and human rights organizations are closely monitoring developments, especially after the September violence.
Any escalation could have diplomatic and security implications, making the protest not just local but geopolitical.
What Happens Next?
The silent march and blackout are just the first step in a planned escalation. LAB and KDA leaders have warned that:
-
If demands remain unmet, larger protests and indefinite strikes could follow.
-
Monasteries, trade unions, student groups, and panchayats will intensify participation.
-
Ladakh could see its largest mass movement since 2019.
Strategic Takeaways
-
The movement has moral clarity, organizational structure, and cross-community unity.
-
Delhi’s response — or lack thereof — will shape its trajectory.
-
Silent protests can be powerful, but they can also be the calm before a storm.
Conclusion — The Power of Quiet Resistance
As night falls and Ladakh’s lights go out on the protest day, the darkness will not just be symbolic — it will be a message. A message from a people who feel sidelined, unheard, and determined to reclaim their democratic voice.
This is not just about statehood. It’s about dignity, identity, and the right to decide their own future.
“We are not shouting,” said an elderly protester. “But we are not silent either.”
Summary Table — Key Facts at a Glance
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Protest Type | Silent March & Blackout |
Announced By | Leh Apex Body (LAB) & Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) |
Protest Date | Mid-October 2025 (exact date withheld) |
Silent March Time | 10 AM – 12 Noon |
Blackout Time | 6 PM – 9 PM |
Key Demands | Statehood, Sixth Schedule, Land & Job Protection, Release of Sonam Wangchuk, Accountability for violence |
Trigger Event | September 24 violence (4 killed, 100 injured) |
Strategy | Peaceful, symbolic, silent protest |